resources to effectively manage it, determines to 
what  extent  a  person  can  cope  with  the 
difficulties  and  changes  he  or  she  faces  daily 
(Chen,  Wu  &  Biljecki,  2021),  (Garau  & 
Annunziata, 2022).  
 
The essence of constructive forms of behavior in 
difficult situations is that they allow one to cope 
with a difficult life situation, to act vigorously, 
consciously, purposefully, and adequately to the 
objective  conditions  of  the  situation  and  one's 
capabilities.  Depending  on  the  situation, 
attention  can  be  paid  either  to  changing  the 
situation  or  to  activating  and  developing  one's 
skills.  In  the  broadest  sense,  constructive 
behavior is ensured by a person's vitality, his or 
her  ability  to  withstand  life's  difficulties,  and 
preserve oneself as a holistic personality (Purvis, 
Mao & Robinson, 2019). 
 
Conclusions 
 
Thus, the analysis of the scientific literature on 
the  research  topic  and  the  results  of  the 
questionnaire  survey  showed  that  rapid  social 
changes are constantly increasing the importance 
of the degree of development of human vitality 
in  various  spheres  of  life.  Largely,  this  also 
applies to professional resilience, which is one of 
the  most  important  components  of  a  person's 
overall viability. 
 
The theoretical analysis of the literature on this 
issue and the results of the survey indicate the 
crucial importance of resilience. It is considered 
the  main  functional  component  of  personal 
development that  maintains the  stability of  the 
personality  system.  Moreover,  resilience  is  a 
system-forming factor that sets the parameters of 
a person's basic capabilities. Through resilience, 
people perceive life problems as less threatening 
and respond to them in a more productive way 
for their health, personal, and professional life. 
 
Bibliographic references  
 
Bertrams,  A.,  Dyllick,  T.  H.,  Englert,  C.,  & 
Krispenz, A. (2020). German Adaptation of 
the Subjective Vitality Scales (SVS-G). Open 
Psychology,  2,  57–75. 
https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2020-0005  
Buchner, L.,  Amesberger, G.,  Finkenzeller, T., 
Moore,  S.R.,  &  Würth,  S.  (2022).  The 
modified  German  subjective  vitality  scale 
(SVS-GM):  Psychometric  properties  and 
application  in  daily  life.  Frontiers  in 
Psychology,  13-2022 
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.948906  
 
Cangiano, F., Parker, S.K., & Yeo, G.B. (2019). 
Does daily proactivity affect well-being? The 
moderating  role  of  punitive  supervision. 
Journal of Organization Behavior, 40, 59-72. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2321  
Carrillo,  A.,  Etchemendy,  E.,  &  Baños,  R.M. 
(2018).  Past,  present,  and  future  life 
satisfaction:  the  role  of  age,  positive  and 
negative  mood.  Current  Psychology,  40,  
629-638.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-
018-9981-9  
Chang, W.H., Kuo, C.-C., & Ni, Y.-L. (2022). 
Mindfulness  enhances  changes  in  athletes’ 
subjective  vitality:  The  moderating  role  of 
coach  interpersonal  style.  Asian  Journal  of 
Sport  and  Exercise  Psychology,    2(3),                  
190-197. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsep.2021.10.002  
Chen,  W.,  Wu,  A.N.,  &  Biljecki,  F.  (2021). 
Classification  of  urban  morphology  with 
deep learning: Application on urban vitality. 
Computers,  Environment  and  Urban 
Systems,  90,  101706. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.202
1.101706  
Fruchart,  E.,  &  Rulence-Pâques,  P.  (2022). 
Predicting  sports  performance  from  well-
being:  A  mapping  of  professional  athletes’, 
amateur athletes’ and non-athletes’ positions. 
European  Review  of  Applied  Psychology,  
72,  6,  100793. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2022.100793  
Garau, C., & Annunziata, A. (2022). A method 
for  assessing the  vitality  potential of urban 
areas. The case study of the Metropolitan City 
of  Cagliari,  Italy.  City,  Territory  and 
Architecture,  9,  7. 
https://cityterritoryarchitecture.springeropen.
com/articles/10.1186/s40410-022-00153-6  
Goldbeck, F., Hautzinger, M., &Wolkenstein, L. 
(2019). Validation of the German Version of 
the  Subjective  Vitality  Scale  –  a  Cross-
Sectional  Study  and  a  Randomized 
Controlled  Trial.  Journal  of  Well-Being 
Assessment,  3,  17–37. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41543-019-00019-8  
Gray,  C.L.,  Messer,  L.C.,  Rappazzo,  K.M.,     
Jagai,  J.S.,  Grabich,  S.C.,  &  Lobdell,  D.T. 
(2018).  The  association  between  physical 
inactivity  and  obesity  is  modified  by  five 
domains  of  environmental  quality  in  US 
adults: A cross-sectional study. PloS One, 13, 
8,  e0203301. 
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.020330
1 
Keefer,  M.,  &  DeBeliso,  M.  (2020).  A 
comparison  of  the  United  States  Marine 
Corps  Physical  Fitness  Test  and  Combat 
Fitness Test results. Medicine & Science in