Quarterly  control  over  the  results  of  the 
implementation  of  the  budget,  socio-economic 
and cultural development programs takes place 
through  the  review  by  the  councils  of  the 
corresponding quarterly written reports prepared 
by the executive bodies of local self-government 
and state administrations. Important means in the 
implementation  of  control  measures  by  self-
governing  bodies  over  the  activities  of 
enterprises and organizations that belong to the 
communal property of the respective territorial 
communities are control over the implementation 
of  plans,  over  the  use  of  profits,  as  well  as 
listening to reports on the work of the managers 
of these enterprises (Kaminska, 2010). 
 
In addition to the control self-governing powers 
of local self-government bodies, it is possible to 
single  out  delegated  powers  of  a  controlling 
nature,  which  are  exercised  by  the  executive 
bodies of local self-government: 
 
– carrying  out,  in  accordance  with  the 
legislation, control over the proper operation 
and  organization  of  public  services  by 
enterprises  of  housing  and  communal 
services,  trade  and  public  catering, 
household  services,  transport, 
communication, technical condition, use and 
maintenance of other real estate objects of 
all forms of ownership; making decisions on 
cancellation of the permission given by them 
for  the  operation  of  objects  in  case  of 
violation  of  environmental,  sanitary  rules, 
other requirements of legislation; 
– implementation of control over compliance 
with  legislation  on  the  protection  of 
consumer rights; 
– control  over  the  state  of  apartment 
registration  and  compliance  with  housing 
legislation  at  enterprises,  institutions  and 
organizations  located  in  the  relevant 
territory,  regardless  of  the  forms  of 
ownership; 
– monitoring the provision of social protection 
for  employees  employed  in  jobs  with 
harmful  working  conditions  at  enterprises, 
institutions and organizations, as well as the 
quality  of  certification  of  workplaces, 
working  conditions  and  providing 
employees with benefits and compensation 
for  working  in  harmful  conditions  in 
accordance with the law ; 
– implementation of control over compliance 
with land and nature protection legislation, 
use and protection of land, natural resources 
of  national  and  local  importance, 
reproduction of forests; 
– carrying out in the prescribed manner state 
control  over  compliance  with  legislation, 
approved  town  planning  documentation  in 
the  planning  and  development  of  the 
relevant  territories;  stopping,  in  cases 
provided  for  by  law,  construction  that  is 
carried  out  in  violation  of  urban  planning 
documentation  and  projects  of  individual 
objects, and may also cause damage to the 
surrounding natural environment; 
– monitoring  of  ensuring  the  reliability  and 
safety of buildings and structures, regardless 
of ownership, in areas affected by dangerous 
natural  and  man-made  phenomena  and 
processes (Redkin, 2014). 
 
In addition, based on the analysis of legislation 
and scientific sources, we can also come to the 
conclusion  that  the  bodies  of  state  power  and 
local self-government have acquired certain anti-
corruption  powers  (Bondarenko,  Utkina, 
Dumchikov,  Prokofieva-Yanchylenko, 
Yanishevska,  2021).  That  is,  with  the 
development  of  anti-corruption  powers,  the 
control of anti-corruption activities is entrusted 
to local self-government bodies. 
 
This  is  confirmed  by  the  fact  that  it  is  quite 
obvious that in the conditions of decentralization 
and the transfer of significant material resources 
to  localities,  the  requirements  for  transparency 
and accountability of the local government, the 
integrity of the relevant officials reach a higher 
level. This, in turn, requires a qualitatively new 
level of organization of anti-corruption work and 
integrity  system  at  the  regional  level (USAID, 
2022). 
 
The  control  function  over  local  finances  is 
implemented,  in  particular,  in  the  activities  of 
local self-government bodies when drafting local 
budgets, their consideration and approval, as well 
as the implementation and preparation of a report 
on  the  implementation of local  budgets,  in the 
process of control over the formation and use of 
budget funds. The scope of the control function 
is not limited to local budgets, but includes other 
cash funds and, in general, all financial resources 
at  the  disposal  of  local  self-government.  The 
control  system  should  be  aimed  at  correcting 
violations  and  preventing  them  in  the  future. 
Strengthening local public control over the use of 
budget funds will be effective (Fugelo, 2015). 
 
In  which  areas  exactly  does  it  match,  which 
reports  exactly,  and  what  does  the  control 
function consist of: