are enough works in psychology in which various 
aspects of the problem of psychological barriers 
in  creative  activity  were  studied,  but  they  are 
devoted more to the study of problems in youth 
and  adulthood.  The  development  of  creative 
abilities  was  studied  by  С.V.  Aymedov, 
Yu. O. Asieieva,  H. Alieksieieva,                                     
N.  Kravchenko,  L.  Horbatiuk,  V.  Zhyhir,                         
O.  Chernieha,  A.  Craft,  V. Levkovska, 
V. Storozh,  R.  Dunn,  A.  Harris,                                            
G. D. Chistyakova and others (Aymedov et al., 
2018,  Alieksieieva  et  al.,  2020;  Asieieva  & 
Panaiotova,  2019;  Bogoyavlenskaya,  2002; 
Chistyakova,  1991;  Dunne  &  Wragg,  1994, 
Harris, 2016). Issues of the psychology of young 
adolescents are considered in the researches of 
Yu. O. Asieieva,  R.  Ewing,  R.  Gibson, 
W. Forrester, A. Hui, So. Kyunghee,  Hu. Yaeji 
and others (Asieieva & Panaiotova, 2019; Ewing 
&  Gibson,  2015;  Forrester  &  Hui,  2007; 
Kyunghee & Yaeji, 2019). There are studies in 
which it is noted that psychological barriers both 
negatively and positively affect the development 
of  an  individual  and  his  creative  abilities 
(G. O. Ball,  M.  V. Bastun,  O.  G. Vydra, 
N. I. Voloshko,  L. M. Hrydkovets,                                      
D.  B. Bogoyavlenskaya,  Ya.  A. Ponomarev,                  
A.  V. Massanov,  D. Bar-Tal,  E. Halperin, 
F. Piske,  T. Stoltz,  C. Vestena,  S. Freitas, 
B. Valentim, С. Oliveira, etc.) (Ball et al., 2005; 
Bogoyavlenskaya,  2002;  Ponomarev,  1976, 
Massanov,  2016,  Bar-Tal  &  Halperin,  2014, 
Piske et al., 2016).  
 
It  was  also  established  that  there  are 
contradictions in the perceptions of the role of the 
Examinee's  personal  characteristics  in 
overcoming  psychological  barriers  in  creative 
activity,  which  are  related  to  determining  the 
influence  of  personal  characteristics  on  the 
success  of  overcoming  a  psychological  barrier 
(Craft, 2008; Ewing & Gibson, 2015; Aymedov 
et al., 2018; Asieieva & Panaiotova, 2019).  In 
the  works  of  scientists,  it  was  proved  that 
psychological  barriers  play  a  leading  role  in 
personality  development.    It  is  precisely  the 
development  of  creative  thinking  that  occurs 
during the solution of emerging problems that act 
as  obstacles  to  achieving  the  goal  (Shakurov, 
2001;  Bar-Tal  &  Halperin,  2014;  Matyush, 
2016). As A. A. Osipova notes, everything that 
happens  to  a  person  under  the  influence  of  a 
psychological barrier is experienced by them as a 
state of stress, discomfort, tension, which leads 
to  a  deviation  from  normal  functioning. 
However,  mental  development  leads  to  the 
restoration  of  balance  and  reduction  of  stress 
(Osipova  &  Prokopenko,  2014).  Thus,  the 
success of creative activity depends on getting rid 
of the template in the activity and overcoming the 
barrier  of  stereotypes.  But,  according  to  the 
research  of  T.V.  Kudryavtsev  and                                                        
Ya.  O.  Ponomarev,  one  of  the  most  important 
functions of the barrier is to ensure the stability 
of  the  individual  (Kudryavtsev,  1975; 
Ponomarev,  1976).  In  his  works,                                       
Ya. O. Ponomarev points out the need to research 
ways to overcome psychological barriers, noting 
that instead of searching for particular methods 
and algorithms that lead to the creation of a new 
one,  it  is  necessary  to  develop  a  system  of 
measures designed to  prevent  errors  of inertia, 
that prevent its occurrence, and are directed, if it 
has  already  appeared,  to  the  destruction  of 
standard  principles  and  routine  techniques 
(Ponomarev,  1976).  The  success  of  a  creative 
solution depends on the ability of a person to get 
rid of the template in solving the problem and to 
understand  that  the  methods  used  before  are 
invalid. 
 
However,  it  is  precisely  the  problem  of 
preventing  the  occurrence  and  overcoming  of 
undesirable  psychological  barriers  that  is 
relevant  today,  as  noted  by  (V.  Ageyev, 
T. V. Kudryavtsev,  A.  A.  Matyush, 
R. Kh. Shakurov, etc.) (Ageyev, 2012; Matyush, 
2016; Kudryavtsev, 1975; Shakurov, 2001). 
 
Therefore, despite the large number of studies on 
this issue, the study of psychological barriers in 
the development of creative abilities of younger 
teenagers  remains  an  understudied  aspect  and 
requires  detailing  various  aspects  of  this 
phenomenon. 
 
Results and discussion 
 
In  order  to  study  the  peculiarities  of  the 
manifestation  of  psychological  barriers  in  the 
development  of  creative  abilities  in  young 
adolescents of Ukraine and China, we conducted 
a comparative analysis of the results according to 
the methods of P. Torrens, G. Davis (Shestakova, 
2015), Pryhozhan (2002), "Non-existent animal", 
the author-developed questionnaire for the study 
of psychological barriers in the development of 
creative abilities. 
 
Tables 1-2 present the results of the study of the 
level  of  development  of  creative  abilities  and 
personal  characteristics  in  the  young  Chinese 
sample group. 
 
Based on the data in Table 1, we can say that the 
average  level  of  expression  of  creativity  as  a 
personality  quality  prevails  among  young 
adolescents  aged  10-12  years  of  the  Chinese