meta-anthropology;  revealing  fundamental 
points  for  understanding  the  subject  (care, 
responsibility,  life,  energy,  etc.);  the  protest 
against  permanent  aesthetic  canons  having 
demonstrated their ineffectiveness. 
 
The biography obtains significant popularity as 
the most required genre. The ideals of the century 
influenced  individual’s  daily  life  arrangement. 
Various biographical research schools emerge – 
psycho-biographical  (based  on  the  impact  of                
Z.  Freud’s  views),  historical  (Lytton Strachey), 
hermeneutic (Wilhelm Dilthey), popular science, 
etc.  Multifaceted  genre  types  are  being 
distinguished,  i.e.  historical,  fiction,  scientific, 
"new",  artistic,  etc.  Their  methodological 
approaches differ, but they have some common 
characteristics:  interest  in  the  character’s  inner 
world,  activity  motives,  creativity 
manifestations,  aspiring  after  objectivity, 
reliance on the experience and the predecessors’ 
achievements,  etc.  The  position  of  the  author 
being responsible for the way of representation, 
the created image of the profile of the narration 
is gradually being confirmed. 
 
During the abovementioned period, philosophers 
study both  theoretical  and  historical aspects of 
the master’s chronicle, as well as distinguish the 
structuring  criteria,  study  the  epoch 
transformations, which means that the stage of 
considering  the  genre  laws  emerges.  Each 
research school manifest their view, but the issue 
that unites them is a detailed study of private life 
facts,  the  awareness  of  the  artist's  opus  as  a 
biography component. 
 
It  is  worth  notifying  that  the  states  with  a 
totalitarian system promote an idealized type of 
biography (its genesis takes its cue from the so-
called  English  Victorian  chronicles  of  the  19th 
century). Its dominant features are the following: 
the canonization of the character of the narration, 
the  disclosure  of  only  positive  features  of  life 
creativity (the facts of daily life characterized by 
an  immoral  nature  are  being  suppressed),  the 
identification  of  the  significant  role  of  a 
personality  for  cultural  development,  the 
reproduction  of  overall  love  and  piety  for  the 
chronicle’s profile. This approach treats an artist 
as a unique individual who is important for the 
society,  and  thus  he  has  no  right  for  mistake. 
They are mediators of a perfect system of values, 
while  their  opuses  are a  reflection  of  a  highly 
ethical way of being. 
 
Thus, the Modernism has witnessed the further 
progress  of  personality  studies  marked  by  the 
emergence  of  various  views  on  the  genre,  the 
desire to understand its laws, to become aware of 
the  society’s  history  through  the  master’s 
ontology  and  their  achievements.  Within  the 
period  under  consideration,  the  elaborations of 
chronicle researchers of the preceding European 
epochs  of  cultural  development  are  being 
synthesized,  and  on  their  basis,  an  innovative 
methodological  basis  is  constructed,  and  this 
becomes  the  foundation  for  the  boost  of 
biographical studies in the late 20th century. 
 
The late 20th century is the Postmodernism era. 
Its emergence was a consequence of the events of 
the  Second  World  War  experienced  by  the 
humanity, the crisis of humanitarian knowledge, 
social consciousness transformation and seeking 
innovative  forms  of  rendering  the  reality.  The 
anthropocentric paradigm of the abovementioned 
period specifically develops the achievements of 
the  preceding  eras  (through  their  synthesis, 
collage, quotations, allusions, etc.), and instantly 
comes into conflict with them, and, via revealing 
controversies, constructs an ideological platform 
for the further civilizational progress. 
 
The  era  awareness,  manifesting  its  holistic 
picture  is  impossible  without  mastering  the 
master’s  socio-cultural  role  and  their  ontology 
being  profoundly  presented  within  the 
chronicles.  Existential  changes  have 
presupposed  the  features  of  structuring, 
perception by the genre recipients and altered the 
semantic dominants. The crucial qualities of the 
artistic biography are the interdisciplinary issue 
(the  authors  appeal  to  psychology,  sociology, 
culture studies, philosophy, literature, and other 
sciences)  and  syncretism  (the  creative 
combination  of  miscellaneous  humanitarian 
knowledge  suggests  a  new  interpretation  of 
individual chronicles). 
 
The  integration  of  the  achievements  of 
psychology  contributes  to  the  study  of 
personality behavior mechanisms, revealing the 
specifics of shaping and evolving the talent, key 
events  analysis,  their  impact  on  the  master’s 
further daily life. Such vision enables to realize 
architectonically  the  ongoing  continuity  of  the 
individual’s  creative  self-expression.  The 
involvement  of  sociological  elaborations 
contributes  to  understanding  the  personality’s 
public  position  and  their  role  in  the  course  of 
social processes (reviewing them via opuses), the 
intersubjective  phenomena  transference.  The 
master exists within a certain epoch, the events 
of  which  predetermine  the  world  outlook, 
actions, the creativity issue, etc. Therefore, the 
involvement of historical achievements enhances 
the  reproduction  of  individual  and  corporate