defined  sensitivity  or  other  parameters),  the 
material recorded by the camera can be used to 
identify  criminals  and  further  investigate  the 
crime. For example, if the hotel is equipped with 
such  technology,  it  is  possible  to  allow  only 
guests’ cars to enter the hotel, and to the rooms 
—  only  the  people  staying  in  them.  It  is  also 
necessary  to  ensure  proper  lighting  of  the 
territory that is the object of surveillance for the 
camera (Myroshnychenko et al., 2020). It is quite 
easy in the case of a hotel area, but in the case 
when the camera is installed, for example, in a 
criminal  area,  the  installation  of  proper  street 
lighting can cause certain difficulties. In addition 
to financial costs, the possibility that the lanterns 
may  be  broken  by  intruders  poses  certain 
difficulties. 
 
In addition to hotel territory and areas with a high 
level  of  crime,  an  important  example  of  the 
effective  use  of  video  surveillance  cameras  is 
their installation in places with a large flow of 
tourists. For example, in airports or other places 
of large crowds. Such measures can be effective 
not  only  for  the prevention  or  investigation  of 
minor crimes (for example, theft), but also for the 
prevention  of  such  serious  crimes  as  terrorist 
acts. 
 
On  the  one  hand,  wide  opportunities  of  video 
surveillance  increase  security  in  tourist  places, 
but they can affect privacy. Besides, each country 
has  legislative  provisions  regarding  the 
possibility of using video and photo materials (as 
well  as  other  evidence  obtained,  in  particular, 
with the use of technical equipment) as evidence. 
In Ukraine, the use of operational equipment by 
the National Police is provided for in Articles 30-
32  of  the  Constitution  of  Ukraine  (The 
Constitution  of  Ukraine,  2020).  These  articles 
provide for the possibility of restricting certain 
rights and freedoms of a person, in particular, the 
inviolability  of  housing,  the  secrecy  of 
correspondence,  telephone  conversations,  non-
interference in personal and family life, etc., in 
the presence of a court decision or in the case 
when obtaining the necessary information related 
to  a  criminal  violation  by  other  means  is 
impossible. According to the Criminal Procedure 
Code  (CPC)  of  Ukraine  (Código  de 
Procedimiento Penal No. 4651-VI, 2012), video 
materials  can  serve  as  evidence  in  a  criminal 
case. 
 
At  the  same  time,  some  controversial  points 
regarding the use of evidence obtained with the 
use  of  video  records  are  worth  noting.  For 
example,  given  the  long  time  it  takes  to 
investigate crimes in tourism, which is typical of 
such crimes given the distance (for example, if 
the victim lives in another country), it could be 
useful to use video footage of the interrogation as 
evidence  in  court.  The  duration  of  the 
investigation  may  cause  forgetting  of  certain 
facts that were observed during the interrogation. 
However, according to Article 23 of the Criminal 
Procedure Code of Ukraine “Direct examination 
of testimonies, objects and documents” (Código 
de  Procedimiento  Penal  No.  4651-VI,  2012), 
testimony  given  in  the  pre-trial  investigation 
cannot  be  used  as  evidence  in  court,  which  is 
provided  because  of  the  possibility  of  putting 
pressure on the suspect during interrogation. 
 
The following most important conclusions can be 
drawn from the conducted research. First, in the 
conditions  of  increasing  threats  of  various 
origins,  in  particular,  for  international  tourists, 
increasing the effectiveness of the investigation 
process is an objective necessity. Secondly, the 
use  of  technical  measures  can  significantly 
improve  this  process  by  providing  additional 
evidence, as well as prevent a number of crimes. 
Thirdly, investigative actions must comply with 
legal requirements. The legislative framework, in 
turn, must be constantly optimized in accordance 
with the development of technologies in order to 
enable  the  legal  application  of  the  necessary 
technical  means.  In  this  regard,  future  studies 
should take into account not only methodological 
features of the use of technological means, but 
also  proposals  for  improving  the  legislative 
framework. 
 
Discussion 
 
So, the use of technical equipment to detect and 
investigate  crimes  in  tourism  is  an  effective 
measure to increase the number of solved crimes. 
Besides,  technical  equipment  is  an  effective 
measure  to  prevent  crimes.  However,  during 
their use, a detailed study of the legislation of the 
country in which the crime is being investigated 
is necessary  in  order to determine whether  the 
use  of  technical  equipment  does  not  violate 
certain legal provisions, as well as to determine 
the possibility of using the obtained materials as 
evidence. 
 
The author of this study examines,  first  of  all, 
crimes committed against tourists. Some studies 
also  describe  deviant  behaviour  of  tourists 
themselves,  as  well  as  violations  by  tourism 
industry  establishments.  Mataković  and  Cunjak 
Mataković (2019) distinguish crimes in tourism 
into  those  committed  by  locals,  tourists,  and 
representatives of the tourism industry. All types