Shinkarenko, Rogova, and Panivnyk (2018) drew 
attention  to  the  peculiarities  of  regulatory 
regulation  of  cryptocurrencies  in  foreign 
countries.  At  the  current  stage  of  regulatory 
development, it can be remarked that there are no 
unified  standards  for  the  regulation  of 
cryptocurrencies  in  any  jurisdiction  and  each 
central bank and authorized body is guided by its 
approaches:  from  formal  permission  or  the 
application of general principles of regulation in 
the field of payments to the complete protection 
of such activities.  
 
Finally,  Miravalls  (2021)  and  Qureshi  (2022) 
investigated  the  issue  of  virtual  currency 
insurance  and  concluded  that  it  is  an  essential 
tool for ensuring business and wallet security. 
 
Therefore,  from  the  above  analysis  of  the 
literature, it can be concluded that currently there 
are problematic issues regarding the insurance of 
virtual  assets,  in  particular,  the  recognition  of 
virtual  assets  as  insurable,  as  well  as  the 
predictability of insurance risks, etc. At the same 
time, a number of scientists noted that the use of 
blockchain  technology  in  the  field  of 
organization  of  policyholder  service  can  be 
progressive and effective in the activities of an 
insurance company. In general, all authors agree 
that  in  today's  environment,  virtual  currency 
insurance  is  an  important  tool  to  ensure  the 
security of businesses and wallets. 
 
Research methodology 
 
To  investigate  the  problematic  issues  of 
insurance  of  virtual  assets, various methods  of 
scientific research were used.  
 
Legal  analysis:  By  using  the  method  of  legal 
analysis, the regulatory regulation and legislation 
related  to  insurance  of  virtual  assets  was 
investigated.  In  particular,  the  provisions  of 
Regulation  (EU)  2023/1114  of  the  European 
Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on 
markets  in  crypto-assets,  and  amending 
Regulations  (EU),  the  Law  of  Ukraine  "On 
Virtual  Assets"17  and  the  draft  Law  on 
Amendments were analyzed to the Tax Code of 
Ukraine  and  other  legislative  acts  of  Ukraine 
regarding the regulation of the turnover of virtual 
assets  in  Ukraine.  Overall,  the  legal  analysis 
indicates  that  while  there  are  some  regulatory 
frameworks in place for virtual assets in Ukraine 
and  the EU, specific provisions addressing the 
insurance of virtual assets may be lacking. There 
is a need for further development and refinement 
of  laws  and  regulations  to  ensure  adequate 
protection for individuals and businesses holding 
virtual assets and to facilitate the growth of the 
insurance market in this area. 
 
Empirical method: The empirical method made it 
possible to conduct several observations on the 
change  in  the  attitude  of  countries  to 
cryptocurrency and its regulation. Thanks to the 
benefit of this research method, it was analyzed 
how  the  position  regarding  the  need  to  insure 
virtual  assets  is  developing.  The  empirical 
findings  underscore  the  dynamic  nature  of 
attitudes towards insuring virtual assets and the 
importance of ongoing research and analysis in 
shaping  regulatory  frameworks  and  industry 
practices. 
 
Historical  method:  The  use  of  the  historical 
method was reasonable for the study of insurance 
of  virtual  assets,  as  it  allows  considering  the 
evolution of this field at different stages of the 
development  of  technology  and  the  insurance 
market. With the help of this method, the stages 
of  formation  and  development  of  insurance  of 
virtual  assets  were  considered,  which  types  of 
virtual  assets  underwent  changes  in  their 
insurance history, and which challenges arose at 
different stages were determined. The evolution 
of laws and regulations related to the insurance 
of  virtual  assets  was  also  considered. 
Determining  how  the  legal  environment 
influenced  the  development  of  the  insurance 
market  and  how  it  adapted  to  technological 
changes.  The  historical  method  provided  a 
comprehensive understanding of the insurance of 
virtual assets by contextualizing its development 
within  broader  historical  trends  and  regulatory 
frameworks. It shed light on the challenges faced, 
the adaptations made, and the trajectory of future 
developments in this evolving field. 
 
Logical analysis: Logical research methods for 
solving problems and studying particular aspects 
of the research object played a significant role in 
the research. In particular, the concept analysis 
method was used to uncover and clearly define 
key  terms and concepts related to virtual asset 
insurance.  This  made  it  possible  to  clarify  the 
understanding of the research subject and create 
a  logical  basis  for  the  analysis.  The 
argumentative  analysis  method  facilitated  the 
consideration of arguments that support or refute 
specific claims regarding virtual asset insurance. 
Logical research methods enhanced the rigor and 
coherence of the study, enabling researchers to 
systematically  analyze  and  interpret  the 
complexities  of  virtual  asset  insurance.  By 
clarifying  key  concepts  and  evaluating 
arguments, researchers advanced understanding